Research on experimental substantiation of biological significanceindividual constitutional markers in 2017–2018

AUTHORS : Golikov S.K. | Finogeev V.V. | Agaeva G.I. | Akaeva T.V. | Vasilkovskaya O.V. | Gorbenko S.V. | Ignatova M.V. | Kretova M.S. | Rybko V.O. | Shadrichev V.A. | Mkhitaryan K.N.

RELEVANT UNIVERSITIES : Center “IMEDIS”, Laboratory for Determinative Research at the International University, Moscow, Russia; Baku, Azerbaijan; Clinic “Vitamed-plus”, Gabrovo, Bulgaria; City polyclinic number 11, Integral Health LLC, Moscow, 7Clinic “City of Health”, Voronezh, LLC Practician, Kursk, Yaroslavl State Medical University, Yaroslavl, Russia

YEAR : 2019 | Category : Research

Introduction Currently, in information medicine, the question of the biological significance of individual constitutional markers (ICM) – models of the patient’s constitution, built using the techniques and equipment of modern medicine, is relevant. In particular, the question of their effectiveness as markers of compensation in the construction of a control signal for optimal therapy.

The paper presents the results of patients’ therapy with the use of ART and BRT methods based on compensation of various ICM. The effectiveness of such therapy is tantamount to the effectiveness of the corresponding ICM as a marker of compensation, and hence its biological significance for the body, while its ineffectiveness indicates the absence of this significance. Recall that historically the first PCM was the KMX marker [1] – the total control signal (CS) written off from the end and nodal points of the main chiroglyphic lines of the palm (OHL) (Fig. 1, 2).